The question I have is regarding the practice of signing photos. I have started signing my photos as subtly as I can. This is not out of a fear of theft, because I really don't think about that at all, but just because I would like to be identified with my photos. I know that purists would say that your style should be your signature but I think that only a handful of photographers on DA are in that lofty position.
I am interested in your opinion and I might even go along with the majority.

I am pleased to present new, long overdue, friends features for your enjoyment.
Rebecca
------------------------------------------------------
I watch and admire the work of the following deviants
------------------------------------------------------

Anna, a long-time favourite from the UK.
:thumb111100715::thumb130687073::thumb84356517::thumb128872366::thumb81414514:

Patrick from France.
:thumb120883133::thumb121165538::thumb119187820::thumb115079523::thumb130987017:

Juan from Spain






Sandra, a Canadian in Florida
:thumb129636695::thumb128558202::thumb124904183::thumb127375790::thumb113996636:
I'd recommend doing it to minimise annoyance down the track, but it's up to you really.
After I have finished the painting this morning I will get on and have a look at the albums..
About signing photo's I think it all depends on the artist if you think it is good then go for it especially if you think someone will steal it..
I hate watermarks and only one thing worse than that is these tiny photos not much bigger than thumbnails members upload to DA with watermarks
Put me down as a No.
I agree with what
Yes it is great if you can recognize your photo's on other sites, shame if you don't want them there though.